The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner – DMI Alternatives Private Limited under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the Show Cause Notice dated 27thJuly, 2024 and consequential order dated 30th January, 2025.
The joy, anticipation, and planning that accompany pregnancy are unmatched. But amid all the excitement, it’s easy to overlook one important aspect: the financial preparation for medical expenses.
ITAT Bangalore held that provisions of section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act are application only when there is transfer of any asset to the partners account from the firm. Accordingly, section 45(4) cannot be invoked in case of incremental capital brought in by the new partner.
Allahabad High Court sets aside GST registration cancellation due to lack of physical notice and personal hearing, upholding natural justice principles for taxpayers.
Allahabad High Court rules GST MOV-09 must be issued after penalty payment, upholding the right to appeal. This clarifies departmental obligations for detained goods.
Understand the evolving GST implications for renting residential and commercial properties in India, including changes in forward charge and reverse charge mechanisms.
ITAT Kolkata held that compensation received for failure of performance guarantee parameter of capital assets [Wind Turbine Generators] is in nature of capital receipt and hence outside the purview of taxation. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Orissa High Court held that disallowance of input tax credit under GST without granting proper opportunity to substantiate the claim is not justified. Accordingly, ex-parte order passed is liable to be set aside and matter remanded back.
ITAT Jodhpur held that issuance of re-assessment notice under section 148 of the Income tax Act to non-existent firm and to deceased partners is invalid issuance of notice. Accordingly, order passed thereon is liable to be quashed.
ITAT Raipur held that ex-parte order passed by CIT(A) is liable to be set aside since there were justifiable reasons for the assessee trust of having remained unaware about the on-going appellate proceedings before the CIT(A). Accordingly, matter restored back for fresh consideration.
