Explore SEBI’s buyback regulations for transparency, fairness, and investor protection. Learn about legal provisions, methods, and challenges faced by companies.
The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny assessment and notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued. Consequently, notice u/s 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were also issued.
Karnataka High Court rules Section 263 cannot be invoked solely due to the absence of a DVO report, if best judgment assessment was an option.
The plaintiff entity is a company engaged in the business of constructing and redeveloping immovable properties, either on a contractual or collaborative basis, and subsequently selling such properties.
Karnataka revises monthly profession tax rates under 1976 Act, with effect from April 1, 2025; February’s rate set higher than other months.
CESTAT Chennai held that cess levied on export of Shrimp and Prawns was unlawful and since the element of Agricultural Produce Cess paid on the export of Prawns and Shrimps was not passed, refund of the same is eligible.
ITAT Nagpur held that addition towards unexplained expenditure u/s. 69C of the Income Tax Act not warranted since the same are already covered in declaration of income hence no separate additions warranted.
NCLAT Delhi held that lease hold rights are assets of Corporate Debtor hence termination of the same by GIDC is in violation of section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Thus, appeal filed by Resolution Professional deserves to be allowed.
Explore privacy and legal concerns around facial recognition in India, and the need for a clear regulatory framework to manage its use and protect citizens’ rights.
Through a meticulous examination of Capital Market Securities Regulations, this paper aims to provide insights into their significance, effectiveness, and areas for improvement, while also highlighting the interplay between market regulation and investor protection in fostering a robust capital market ecosystem.
