In re Shri Venkateshwara Infrastructure J V (GST AAR Maharashtra) AAR find that the Central railway Department, which has given the impugned work to the applicant, can be termed as Central Government. The status of Railways is that of Government only but it is a business entity. Hence, we find that, in the subject case, […]
In re Sundaram Finance Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Q1. Whether the portion of the certain additional services viz., payment of road tax/registration fees, insurance premium, etc., rendered by the applicant in the course of its Leasing of the vehicle/s to the Lessee falls under the category of services of a pure agent? A1. The portion […]
In re Sivanthi Joe Coirs (GST AAR Tamilnadu) it is seen that the question in respect of applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of the Act is covered under the ambit of this authority. In the case at hand, the applicant has stated that the question pertain to the applicability of Notification No. […]
In re Coral Manufacturing Works India Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The applicant claims the Input Tax Credit of the GST paid on the Steel, cement and other consumables used in proportion to the additional reinforcements. From the submissions, it is seen that the applicant has procured composite supply of works contract of increased foundation […]
In re Devendran Coal International Private Limited (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) ‘Sale of coal’ by the applicant and subsequent supply of coal handling and distribution service ordered by a customer separately is not a composite supply. Applicant is liable to discharge GST on Coal Handling and distribution charges collected at the applicable rates (at present […]
In re Lloyds Register Consulting Energy Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – Whether the project management consultancy services provided by the applicant to Vedanta Limited (Division: Cairn Oil & Gas) would be liable to GST at the rate of 12% from January 2018 under serial no. 21(ia) i.e. under Service Accounting Code (“SAC”) 9983 […]
Sabu M. Jacob Vs State of Kerala (Kerala High Court) The sum and substance of the prosecution case is that, the petitioner who is the Managing Director of Kitex Garments Limited failed to ensure, health, safety and welfare of the workers, while they were at work in the factory by providing and maintaining arrangements for […]
High Court held that Work from home after availing the maternity benefit could be given only in case where the nature of work assigned to the woman is such that it is possible for her to work from home.
Sohan Singh Rao Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) It is admitted position that the petitioner and Vinaykant Ameta were Director in M/s Miraj Products Private Limited. As per the prosecution story, they had evaded tax of Rs. 869 Crores. GST department had seized one truck which was being unloaded at their premises. The […]
Stay on top of tax compliance and statutory due dates for April 2022 with our comprehensive compliance calendar.
