Economic Reforms Inclduing GST and Insurance Amendment Bill are on the Anvil: FM; Calls for Large Investment from Domestic and International Investors in Infrastructure Sector The Union Finance Minister Shri Arun Jaitley said that the Government has taken series of measures to tackle various challenges being faced by the infrastructure sector in the country. The […]
The tariff items and descriptions of goods in the said Schedule are aligned with the tariff items and descriptions of goods in the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) at the four-digit level only.
In the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms, 1956, in Rule 12A, for the brackets and words “(Accounts) in the Department of Company Affairs”, the words “in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs” shall be substituted.
(1) These rules may be called the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback (Amendment) Rules, 2014. (2) They shall come into force on 22nd November, 2014.
Krishna, In Maharashtra State discussion on proving Majority and resolution for proving trust in Government is going on. It’s for the formation and running of the Government. But what if, it happens in business, please explain what the importance of majority and resolutions in business.
Briefly stated facts are that the assessee claimed deduction for Rs.6,88,12,554/- and Rs.23,78,781/- being amount payable to EYGS LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, UK respectively towards reimbursement of costs for providing access to system & management audit methodology updates
Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd.(the Appellant) entered into an Agreement with KPH Dream Cricket Pvt. Ltd. (KPH) for sponsoring the cricket team Kings XI Punjab. On the said contractual consideration, a Service tax of Rs. 37,08,000/- was collected by KPH from the Appellant
Siddhi Vinayak Steel Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai [2014 (10) TMI 689 – CESTAT MUMBAI] Certain goods belonging to Siddhi Vinayak Steel (the Appellant) and lying at Shreenath Warehouse were seized when the SIIB found that certain goods were illegally imported through Chennai port under DEEC license for local market in Mumbai.
In the case in hand, from the facts, it was clearly established that the assessee had put a wrongful claim of depreciation and thereby had furnished inaccurate particulars of income for the purpose of concealment of real income, hence, the penalty proceedings were correctly initiated by the AO.
NIIT Limited (the Petitioner) executed a contract dated June 29, 2002 (the Contract) with the Government of Andhra Pradesh for imparting computer education in High Schools in the State of Andhra Pradesh, including leasing of computer hardware, software and connected accessories on Build Own Operate Transfer (BOOT) basis.
