Follow Us:

Judiciary

Assessment of earlier year cannot be reopened on the basis of persuasive finding in subsequent years

January 5, 2013 2708 Views 0 comment Print

From a perusal of the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer, we find that he had simply recorded the finding in the assessment order passed for the assessment year 1996-97 and a vague reference was made that similar was the position in respect of the assessment year in question. The assessment order was for the assessment year 1996-97 on which observation regarding the previous assessment year had been made, has also been reproduced above, while quoting the order passed by CIT appeal.

MAT payable on Loan admitted as income by the Assessee

January 5, 2013 1532 Views 0 comment Print

Whether this agreed addition is to be added while calculating book profit under section 115JB of the Act. Section 115JB provides that where in the case of an assessee being a Company, the income tax payable on total income as computed under this Act is less than 10% (applicable in the impugned Assessment Year) of its book profit, such book profit shall be deemed to be the total income of the assessee.

Disallowance U/s. 40A(2) is not required to be made for TP adjustments

January 5, 2013 4357 Views 0 comment Print

The Explanation to section 92(1) of the Act clarifies that the allowance for any expense or interest arising from an international transaction shall also be determined having regard to the ALP and therefore the disallowance is made under section 92(1) and not under section 40A(2) of the Act.

In the absence of finding by AO Regarding Mis-statement / Non Disclosure, penalty order not justified

January 5, 2013 2039 Views 0 comment Print

As per Explanation 7; no penalty is leviable if the assessee proves that the price charged or paid in such transaction was computed in accordance with the provisions contained in Sec. 92C and in the manner prescribed under section in good faith and with due diligence.

Whether assessee’s failure to get its accounts audited on ground that its entire income was exempt constitutes a reasonable cause?

January 5, 2013 3032 Views 0 comment Print

Having been served with a legal notice for the levy of penalty u/s. 271B, it was incumbent on the assessee to cause to comply with the provision, at least for the second year and, in any case, seek legal opinion in its respect. Rather, it could have, on its own, requested the AO not levy the penalty for that year (i.e., A.Y. 2006-07), explaining that the non-audit of its accounts u/s. 44AB stood caused only due to its ignorance of law,

No Tax payable by Canadian Company on fees for included services by virtue of article 12(5)(a) of DTAA

January 5, 2013 1709 Views 0 comment Print

In so far as the DTAA between India and Canada is concerned, it is observed that article 12(4) thereof gives the definition of the term fees for include services while article 12(5)(a) provides that notwithstanding the said definition given in article 12(4), fees for included services does not include amount paid for services that are ancillary and subsidiary as well as inextricably and essentially linked, to the sale of property.

Dutch Company not eligible for benefits under India-Netherlands treaty, if it charters a ship from a company domiciled in Iran

January 5, 2013 942 Views 0 comment Print

As stated earlier, the risk and liabilities undertaken by the charter M/s Puyvast, the Netherlands entity, is limited only to a situation where the tonnage carried by the vessel is less than 19500 tonnes. Therefore, the substantial freight beneficiary is the owner of the ship, the Iranian entity and in view of this, the conclusion of the revenue authorities that relief under DTAA is not allowable is justified

S. 10B Set-off of eligible unit’s loss against income of non-eligible unit during tax holiday period cannot be allowed

January 5, 2013 2981 Views 0 comment Print

During the period when the eligible unit enjoys exemption u/s.10B of the Act , if it suffers a loss then the same will be quarantined and carried forward to the assessment years immediately following the last of the assessment years for which the Assessee is entitled to claim exemption u/s.10B of the Act, for being set off in accordance with law as if it were any other loss to be dealt with in accordance with Sec.70 to 72 and 32(2) of the Act.

Presumption as to validity of document wouldn’t discharge burden of proof cast on assessee U/s. 68, 69, 69A etc.

January 4, 2013 1198 Views 0 comment Print

We, next, consider the assessee’s argument that the document itself explains the source of the money with it (as on the relevant dates), so that the mandate of the section is satisfied, and no addition could be made. That is, the Department cannot take a contrary stand, accepting the document as true, yet overlooking the fact that the same itself clearly spells out the source of the money.

Payment of Cash Salary Exceeding Rs. 20000 not allowable U/s. 40A(3)

January 4, 2013 11962 Views 0 comment Print

It will be relevant to record that the primary objection noticed by the assessing authority while serving notice upon the assessee as provided U/s 148 of the Act, 1961 was in regard to dis-allowance of salary of Rs.1,50,000/- to the Managing Director of the assessee company on 30th March, 2002 in cash and Rs.5 Lacs towards advance salary for the assessment year 2002-03 in cash on 10.04.2002 and since it was payment of salary in cash exceeding Rs.20,000/-, the above expenses were dis-allowable as provided U/s 40A(3) of the Act, 1961.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930