Follow Us:

Judiciary

Transfer Pricing: Functionally different companies cannot be taken as comparable

August 23, 2018 1134 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Enchanting Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Bangalore) We find that TPO has already taken the total 10 comparables and with respect to 8 comparables, assessee has no objections. With respect to Kerala Travels Interserve Ltd., we have carefully perused its financial statements and we find the main revenue is from different […]

State GST Officers can Inspect, Search & Seize Goods under IGST Act

August 23, 2018 2988 Views 0 comment Print

Advantage India Logistics Private Limited Vs Union of India (Madhya Pradesh HC) On due of the provisions of Section 4 of the IGST Act, we are of the view that officers appointed under the MPGST Act are authorized to be proper officers for the purpose of IGST and, therefore, the contention of the petitioner that […]

Software development and services cannot be compared with activity of making animated film

August 23, 2018 3135 Views 0 comment Print

It is seen that the company has completed full-length animated commercial film during the year under consideration. We note that no separate revenue and expenditure on this activity of making animated film is reported in the Annual Report. Since the activity of making animated film is functionally different from the activity of software development services and thus the segment of ‘software development and services’ of the company, cannot be compared with the functions of the assessee.

Capital Gain cannot be charged in absence of Transfer of Capital Assets

August 23, 2018 3168 Views 0 comment Print

Supermax Personal Care Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We are of the opinion that the endeavor of the departmental officers to tax the transaction in question as capital gains was not supported by the any legal base.First and foremost there was no transfer of capital asset,which is the basis for invoking the provisions of […]

GST on Service of printing of question papers for educational institutions

August 23, 2018 22605 Views 1 comment Print

In re M/s. Edutest Solutions Private Limited (GST AAR Gujarat) The service provided  to educational institutions by way of printing of question papers for conduct of examination by such institutions would be covered by Sr. No. 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended and Notification No. 12/2017-State Tax (Rate), as amended. Thus, as […]

Abacus activity not exempt from payment of GST: AAR

August 23, 2018 6096 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Omnisoft Technologies Private Limited (GST AAR Gujarat) The activity provided by UCMAS using abacus whether qualifies for exemption from the payment of GST? As per Sl. No. 80 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) exempts services by way of training or coaching in recreational activities relating to arts or culture or sports. (In case […]

No Penalty U/s. 271E on cash refund of advance from customers under Bonafide Belief

August 23, 2018 6684 Views 0 comment Print

 M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack) Belief of the assessee that return of advance from customers is not prohibited by section 269T was a bonafide belief. Therefore, the levy of penalty u/s.271E of the Act of Rs.21,49,943/- cannot be sustained. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed by the assessee against […]

5% GST payable on Marine Duty Hydraulic Equipment

August 23, 2018 2247 Views 0 comment Print

In re Fluid Power Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) 5% GST payable on Marine Duty Hydraulic Equipment designed & custom built to be fitted on barge Question 1:- Applicability of GST @ 5% (CGST of 2.5% and SGST of 2.5%) or IGST @ 5% for the above mentioned Marine Duty hydraulic equipment, which is being […]

No Tax Exemption if society Fund was used to provide Scholarships to students for Business Need of group entity

August 22, 2018 1089 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Commitment Mortality Vision Education Society Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) In the instant case by way of collusion between the FIITJEE Group and the assessee, the funds have been given to the Group entities in the name of disbursement of scholarship etc. This collusion is evident from the statement of Sh. Aseem Gupta as how […]

Limitation Law not applies to Service Tax Refund Applications where Tax was paid by Mistake

August 22, 2018 12162 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. 3E Infotech Vs Customs (Madras High Court) we are of the opinion, that when service tax is paid by mistake a claim for refund cannot be barred by limitation, merely because the period of limitation under Section 11B had expired. Such a position would be contrary to the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court, […]

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031