Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Cuttack
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack)
Belief of the assessee that return of advance from customers is not prohibited by section 269T was a bonafide belief. Therefore, the levy of penalty u/s.271E of the Act of Rs.21,49,943/- cannot be sustained.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar dated 29.3.2017 for the assessment year 2008-2009.
2. The sole issue involved in this appeal is that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.21,49,943/- u/s.271E of the Act.
3. According to the Assessing Offic...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

