Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack)
Appeal Number : IT(ss)A No.51/CTK/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/08/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

 M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack)

Belief of the assessee that return of advance from customers is not prohibited by section 269T was a bonafide belief. Therefore, the levy of penalty u/s.271E of the Act of Rs.21,49,943/- cannot be sustained.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar dated 29.3.2017 for the assessment year 2008-2009.

2. The sole issue involved in this appeal is that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.21,49,943/- u/s.271E of the Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031