This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Capital Gain cannot be charged in absence of Transfer of Capital Assets
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Supermax Personal Care Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Supermax Personal Care Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
We are of the opinion that the endeavor of the departmental officers to tax the transaction in question as capital gains was not supported by the any legal base.First and foremost there was no transfer of capital asset,which is the basis for invoking the provisions of section 45 of the Act, in the case under consideration.The AO and FAA have tried to build a house without laying down foundation.Without the existence of capital assets they have tried to tax capital gain. They have nowhere mentioned as to which capital...
