Summary of ITAT Raipur decision in Satish Agrawal vs. ITO. The case concerns denied exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15.
Allahabad High Court directs Bushrah Export House to appeal against refund denial under CGST Act, despite delays and ongoing special appeal.
ITAT Bangalore rules that deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) can’t be assessed by double deeming unless the assessee receives a direct benefit from the company’s payment.
ITAT Bangalore condoned delay of 601 days on the ground that assessee was not having access to mail id mentioned in Form 35 and hence assessee was not aware about ex-parte passing of appellate order. Thus, delay condoned on reasonable cause shown.
ITAT Bangalore held penalty initiation under Sections 271D/271E must be noted in assessment order; temporary family loans without interest are not penalized as deposits.
Patna High Court held that for migrating PAN to new AO, due to change in address, a written request to existing AO must be made. Such procedure needs to be followed for change of jurisdiction.
Held that the appellant has satisfied all the conditions for treating the service as export of service but there is a need to verify whether the service tax paid has been recovered or not from M/s. Aban Singapore Pte. Ltd.
ITAT Hyderabad held that CIT(A) without examining the historical/ empirical data of expenditure incurred by the assessee for rectification / repair of transformers cannot approve the provision thereof. Accordingly, matter remanded back to CIT(A).
ITAT Bangalore rules against adhoc expense disallowance without rejecting books of accounts, citing Karnataka HC’s stance in Konkan Marine Agencies case.
ITAT Hyderabad held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) on the ground of non-deposition of self-assessment tax by the assessee needs re-verification since assessee incurred losses and therefore has a reason for not depositing the self-assessment tax. Hence, matter remanded.
