Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Srinaga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Srinaga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

In the case of Srinaga vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore), the Bangalore Bench of ITAT ruled that the initiation of penalty under Sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act must be linked to the assessment proceedings and must be clearly mentioned in the assessment order. The Tribunal also noted that a temporary loan borrowed by the assessee from close family members without any interest could not be classified as a loan or deposit subject to these penalty provisions. The assessee faced penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for accepting and repayi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Upholds TDS Claim by Single Heir on Joint Property Sale Non-Enquiry by AO on Property Purchase Justifies Section 263 Revision: Hyderabad ITAT Assessment u/s 143(3) Nullifies Section 272A(1)(d) Penalty: ITAT Cochin Assessee Can Raise new Claims Before AO Even After Revised Return Deadline Donations to building fund Taxable in Absence of Section 12AA registration: Cochin ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031