ITAT Ahmedabad held that order of PCIT invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act set aside as conditions necessary for invoking Section 263 of the Act, i.e., the order being erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, are not satisfied.
Notice under section 148 was issued upon assessee by AO for reassessing the cash deposit as undisclosed income, following approval from the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (JCIT).
ITAT Mumbai cancels ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on Sameer Mavji Patel under Section 271B for delayed tax audit report, citing reasonable cause due to survey delays.
CESTAT Kolkata reviewed Rungta Sons Pvt Ltd’s appeal against a Service Tax demand on ‘supply of tangible goods service,’ focusing on control and possession issues.
Gujarat HC sets aside the rejection of a GST registration revocation application, directing fresh consideration by the State Tax Officer within 12 weeks.
Gujarat HC quashes VAT order and penalty notice against Malani Construction. The court demands detailed reasoning in the fresh order for fair assessment.
Assessee, a resident of USA, filed his return claiming refund of Rs.58,57,820/-. During assessment year, assessee had sold two properties for consideration of Rs.1,95,00,0000/- and Rs.72,36,552/- respectively.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition merely on the basis of retracted statement without any incriminating material seized from assessee’s premises is unsustainable in law and liable to be quashed.
Madras HC invalidates non-speaking orders against Queen Agencies, highlighting lack of transparency and legal responsibility in tax assessment disputes.
Delhi High Court revokes orders demanding 40% pre-deposit by AO & Principal Commissioner in Sushen Mohan Gupta vs. PCIT case, citing failure to assess merits and consider undue hardship. Full text of the judgment available.
