Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Haris Kalandan Mohammed Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sri Haris Kalandan Mohammed Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Honourable Bangalore Bench of ITAT in its recent decision held that deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) cannot be assessed unless assessee has received any direct benefit from the loan or advance or payment made by the company. The Tribunal held that  “double deeming” or “fiction on fiction” is not allowed as per the settled position of law. Legal fictions are only for a definite purpose & should not be extended beyond that legitimate field that as held, inter alia, in the Apex Court’s decision in CIT Vs. Mother I...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930