The Assessing Officer was not justified in making addition or disallowance on the issues as the Assessing Officer was not supposed to examine any other issue except the issue for which the scrutiny assessment was ordered.
Kolkata Bench of ITAT ruled in ACIT Vs Pujita Merchandise Pvt. Ltd. that Section 68 of IT Act is applicable when credit is received in the relevant year not for earlier years.
Service Tax Refund of Company cannot can be appropriated towards outstanding dues of proprietary concern of Director: Kerala HC
Associate Lumber Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import) (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai has emphasized that recovery cannot be made effective from the assessee before completion of the appeal period mentioned in section 129 A (3) of the Customs Act, 1962. Legislature has prescribed three months time from the communication of the order. In the […]
Devanur Thimmasetty Srinivasa Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Assessment order taking entirety of the sale consideration without taking note of the indexed cost of acquisition. is liable to set-aside- Karnataka HC In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court quashed an income tax reassessment order and notice issued to the petitioner where the full sale […]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka HC held that Notice and endorsement issued without waiting for expiry of the appeal period of three months is illegal and arbitrary and liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi rules that Section 43B does not apply to unclaimed service tax liabilities, partially allowing the appeals of Sircar Securities for AY 2017-18 and 2019-20.
Bombay HC examines Section 87A rebate issues due to ITR software changes post-July 2024, affecting taxpayers’ rights. Interim relief granted; final hearing on Jan 2025.
Gauhati High Court grants interim bail in a GST evasion case involving ₹10.29 crore. The court emphasized the judicious use of arrest powers under CGST Act.
Kerala High Court directed petitioner to approach Tribunal by filing an appeal u/s. 112 of the CGST/ SGST Act as and when the Tribunal is constituted. Petitioner also directed to pay fine in lieu of confiscation for release of seized gold ornaments.
