CESTAT Delhi held that Amendment Notification no. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021 cannot be said to be retrospective in nature. Accordingly, orders are liable to be set aside and all the appeals are allowed.
ITAT Bangalore held that the assesse is entitled to claim deduction u/s. 54 of the Act if the assesses able to establish the fact that the construction was commenced within the period prescribed of 3 years under the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Pune held that since income of minor child is clubbed in the hands of assessee, TCS collected on the same needs to be credited in the hands of assessee. Accordingly, assessee cannot be deprived from the credit of TCS. Thus, appeal allowed.
ITAT Raipur held that exemption under section 54B of the Income Tax Act is allowable since pre-condition regarding usage of land for agricultural purposes in two years immediately preceding date of transfer is satisfied. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Pune held that denial of exemption under section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act for bonafide mistake of filing ITR-5 instead of correct ITR-7 not justifiable since the same is just a procedural technical mistake.
Delhi High Court sets aside ITC denial due to incorrect GSTN on invoices, ruling in favor of B Braun Medical India Pvt. Ltd. in a dispute with tax authorities.
Supreme Court allows GST rectifications, safeguarding ITC rights for buyers and addressing human errors in filings. Ensures fairness under the GST Act.
Karnataka High Court orders GST appellate authority to hear Takappa’s appeal on merits, citing procedural lapses in rejection.
Calcutta High Court directs fresh GST show-cause notice, citing lack of specific reasoning in original notice concerning GSTR mismatch.
Madras High Court directs appellate authority to hear Nirman Encon’s GST appeal, citing lack of opportunity in original assessment.
