ITAT Pune held that adjustment under section 11(3) of the Income Tax Act as deemed income cannot be sustained as accumulated surplus funds are utilized within stipulated time period and the amendment to the provisions of section 11(3) are held to be prospective in nature.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that delay of 477 days in filing of an appeal on the reason that there was gross negligence on the part of the accountant is not condonable since negligence of accountant not sufficient shown for cause.
The addition of Rs.0.58 Crores as made for cash deposit in the account of IJF with respect to Maheshwari Brothers Coal also stand deleted on same logic. The corresponding grounds of appeal stand allowed.
Karnataka High Court granted bail for offence punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PML Act] taking into consideration the maximum punishment for the alleged offences and that there is no possibility of trial commencing in the near future.
The AO is a deciding authority. In the present case, it is apparent that the AO had decided that it was not a fit case for issuance of a notice under Section 148 of the Act but had, thereafter, revised the said decision apparently on the basis of an approval of the specified authority.
Madras High Court rules that issuing a single GST show cause notice for multiple financial years is impermissible, citing Sections 73 & 74 and procedural hardships for taxpayers.
CESTAT Delhi held that Blower, Filter, Water Valve Assembly, Control Panel, Module JCBHP and Thermostat are classifiable under CTI 8414 59 30, CTI 8421 39 90, CTI 8481 10 90, CTI 8538 10 90 and CTI 9032 10 10 and cannot be reassessed as parts of air conditioner under CTI 8415 90 00. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling rejected KANISKA Engineering Industries LLP’s application concerning Input Tax Credit on warehouse construction due to non-prosecution.
The West Bengal AAR ruled that Webel Support Multipurpose Service Cooperative Society Limited, a sub-contractor, is not eligible for GST exemption on pure labor services to NKDA via WTL.
CESTAT Mumbai held that Chief Commissioner was not justified in rejecting the compounding application filed u/s. 137(3) of the Customs Act, 1962 without granting any opportunity of hearing since the same results into violation of principles of natural justice.
