This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Refund of CVD & ACD cannot be rejected on mere apprehension
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- EMM EII Wooltex Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
EMM EII Wooltex Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Chandigarh: The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh, has allowed a refund claim for Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (ACD) paid by M/s EMM EII Wooltex. The tribunal set aside an order from the Commissioner (Appeals) that had upheld the denial of a portion of the refund, finding the lower authority’s reasoning to be contradictory and based on apprehension rather than concrete evidence of unjust enrichment.
The case dates back to the import of various tex...





