ITAT Chandigarh held that invocation of revisionary power under section 263 of the Income Tax Act not sustainable since PCIT failed to establish that assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Delhi High Court held that exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act is allowed towards different floors of a house considering it as single residential house. Accordingly, appeal of the revenue dismissed.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that petitioner/ university is not liable to pay taxes on supply of food stuff and other items to students since ancillary activities of providing canteen facilities to the inmates of the University would not amount to business as defined by the Act.
Delhi High Court quashes tax demand order for non-consideration of reply and lack of hearing. Future orders contingent on Supreme Court’s decision on notification validity.
ITAT Pune ruled for Yash Construction Co., holding that declared income during survey, if linked to business, cannot be taxed at higher rates under Section 115BBE.
ITAT Pune rules for Late Harilal Mavjibhai Patel, confirming excess stock found during survey is business income, not subject to higher tax rates under Section 115BBE.
Delhi High Court directs Filatex India Ltd. to GST Appellate Authority, noting “identically worded” SCN and Order-in-Original, suggesting non-application of mind.
ITAT Hyderabad rules for Taj GVK Hotels, allowing interest deduction, prior period expense, and accepting accounting method change for AY 2003-04.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Piem Hotels, overturning Section 14A disallowance for AY 2014-15 & 2016-17 due to AO’s lack of recorded satisfaction.
Gujarat High Court has issued a rule on the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)’s second proviso in the CGST Act. The court declined to stay ongoing show cause notice proceedings, stating the petitioner can raise all contentions during adjudication.
