The ITAT Delhi has set aside the CIT(A)’s deletion of a ₹2.32 crore addition made under Section 68, citing a violation of Rule 46A as new evidence was admitted without giving the Assessing Officer a chance to examine it.
Madras High Court held that detention of goods due to route mismatch justified as there was no necessity to travel 41 kms when actual destination point was just 9 kms. Accordingly, rout mismatch clearly shows malafide intention to deliver goods illegally.
ITAT Indore held that AO made addition towards unexplained deposited without being aware of possession of two PAN by single person-assessee. Accordingly, matter remanded to the file of AO with imposition of cost of Rs. 7,000/-.
Calcutta High Court held that merely because share transactions were done through stock exchanges it doesn’t make the transactions genuine. Accordingly, bogus capital loss claim rejected and appeal of revenue allowed.
ITAT Raipur restores appeal dismissed ex-parte by CIT(A), finding no proof of notice served via physical mode as opted by assessee in Form 35.
ITAT Kolkata confirms ₹31.15 lakh loan repayment is not unexplained cash credit, upholding deletion of addition for New Charan Kanwal Finance.
The ITAT Mumbai has ruled against an arbitrary 3% net profit addition for a liquor dealer. The court found the addition was based on assumptions, not evidence, as the books were audited
The Calcutta High Court has restricted Central GST authorities from re-auditing periods already covered by a prior audit, citing Section 65(7) of the GST Act.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has restored a case involving unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 18.32 lakh to the Assessing Officer, citing a failure to examine debit entries and additional evidence, and condoning a 323-day delay in appeal filing.
Commissioner of Customs had confirmed the entire differential duty. Assessee submitted that the intended use of these products was explicitly outlined by the medical licenses that had been awarded to assessee under Medical Devices Rules, 2017.
