ITAT Kolkata ruled for Weilburger Coatings, quashing an assessment order as the AO exceeded limited scrutiny scope without following CBDT conversion procedures.
ITAT Visakhapatnam ruled on whether an Assessing Officer can inquire beyond limited scrutiny, partly allowing an appeal regarding cash deposits during demonetisation.
ITAT Patna ruled the Assessing Officer exceeded limited scrutiny scope by making additions unrelated to large cash deposits without converting to complete scrutiny.
The Competition Commission of India closed a case by Airen Metals against Hindalco and Vedanta, finding no abuse of dominant position regarding copper supply contracts and bank guarantee invocation.
Delhi High Court held that GST SCN uploaded on ‘Additional Notices Tab’ was not noticed by the petitioner. Hence, order set aside and matter remanded back to Adjudicating Authority. Further, petitioner is granted time to file their reply.
CESTAT Delhi held that re-determination of transaction value merely on the basis of emails of quotations of different supplier cannot be sustained since there is absolutely no evidence for rejection of transaction value.
Rajasthan High Court upholds trust registration under Section 12A, ruling initial approval hinges on genuine objects, not income application. Clarifies AO’s role in annual assessments.
Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue’s appeal against Agfa India, ruling reassessment invalid as Assessing Officer acted under dictation, lacking independent reason to believe income escaped assessment. Highlights judicial precedents on AO’s discretion.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of expenditure on adhoc basis without contrary material and without rejection of books of accounts not justifiable. Accordingly, disallowance made in the impugned order deleted.
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd. vs Hitro Energy Solutions Pvt (2022) 7 SCC 164 has held that with respect to the fact that receiver of goods who has paid advances is also an Operational Creditor.
