Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kiranakart Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs Hyretail Technologies Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kiranakart Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs Hyretail Technologies Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT Chandigarh)

NCLAT Chandigarh held that receiver of goods who has paid advances is an operational creditor. Thus, petition allowed as amount admitted to be paid by Corporate Debtor to the Operational Creditor received in excess as advance meets the threshold limit for initiating CIRP u/s 9.

Facts- Kiranakart Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Operational Creditor) has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankr

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031