Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kiranakart Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs Hyretail Technologies Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kiranakart Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs Hyretail Technologies Pvt. Ltd (NCLAT Chandigarh) NCLAT Chandigarh held that receiver of goods who has paid advances is an operational creditor. Thus, petition allowed as amount admitted to be paid by Corporate Debtor to the Operational Creditor received in excess as advance meets the threshold limit for initiating CIRP u/s 9. Facts- Kiranakart Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Operational Creditor) has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930