The Allahabad High Court directed the tax department to refund 90% of a disputed tax amount, citing an arbitrary and premature recovery.
Mumbai ITAT rules that late fees under Section 234E are applicable for delayed TDS statement filings that occurred after June 1, 2015, upholding a Rs. 85,200 penalty.
Delhi High Court held that when the transaction is one of trading in land and no specific remuneration is fixed in the deal for acquisition of land, the same would not be liable to service tax. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
NCLAT Chennai held that time limit prescribed under Regulation 2B of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 for completing and operationalising scheme of arrangement u/s. 230 of the Companies Act is only directory and not mandatory. Accordingly, extension of further 90 days granted.
NCLT Kolkata held that the Corporate Debtor, Shomuk Consultancy Services Private Limited, is ordered to be liquidated in terms of Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code since the statutory period for the CIRP has been exhausted, and no resolution plan has been received.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by Reliance Capital Ltd. for liquidation of Corporate Debtor [Win Trendz Exim Private Limited] allowed as approved by majority of 78.8% of CoC.
NCLT Mumbai held that resolution plan of Corporate Debtor [Shivom Investment and Consultancy Limited] as submitted by Successful Resolution Applicant [Prashantbhai Ghanshyambhai Ukani] stands approved as meets the requirement of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny to examine the source of cash deposits made during the demonetization period. During demonetization period assessee had deposited a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- in her bank account on 16.11.2016.
Madras High Court held that writ filed alleging wrong classification of goods cannot be entertained due to availability of alternative remedy of filing an appeal before CESTAT. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
ITAT Delhi held that addition on the basis of interest paid on cash loans received by the assessee is directed to be deleted. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee are partly allowed.
