The Supreme Court of India clarifies that banks can sell mortgaged property to recover dues. Borrowers must pay the full outstanding amount to prevent the sale.
The ITAT Cochin bench ruled that receiving cash for property at registration violates Section 269SS, overturning a prior decision.
The Rajasthan High Court condoned a 700-day delay in a charitable trust’s filing, citing the president’s severe illness and death, and highlighting the need for a liberal, equitable approach.
CESTAT Chennai held that merely stating the probability of revenue succeeding in their appeal, is a bald statement which cannot be stated to be a reasonable plea for granting stay of order. Hence, stay not granted since sufficient cause not shown.
The Madras High Court recently condoned a 288-day delay in a GST appeal, citing the taxpayer’s ill health and lack of notice. This ruling contrasts with a stricter Jharkhand High Court decision on a similar matter.
The Bombay High Court held that multiple GST show-cause notices for the same issue and period cause harassment, quashing an order-in-original due to an ongoing DGGI investigation.
Supreme Court held that Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises does require MSME to notify the lending bank by producing authenticated and verifiable documents/material to show its eligibility to get the benefit of the said Framework.
The ITAT Lucknow tribunal clarifies that charitable trusts can utilize accumulated income without first spending their current-year income, as per Section 11(2).
The ITAT Lucknow tribunal rules that an accommodation entry provider can only be taxed on its commission income, not the entire amount of routed funds, a clarification of Section 68.
Lucknow ITAT confirms penalty under section 271B, ruling that a taxpayer is responsible for timely tax audit completion and report submission, and blaming the CA is not a valid defense.
