Corporate Law : A detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's verdict on the Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry case, covering corporate governance, minority...
Corporate Law : Calls for a High Court Bench in West UP remain ignored. SC urged to intervene in judicial disparities affecting millions. Know the...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court quashes rape case, stating consensual relationship, even with breach of promise, doesn't automatically constitute ra...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court emphasizes strict scrutiny of FIRs under stringent laws like the UP Gangsters Act to prevent misuse in property ...
Custom Duty : The Supreme Court rules DRI officers as proper officers for customs under Section 28, overturning past judgments and reshaping tax...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Income Tax : Government addresses Supreme Court judgment on tax exemptions for clergy and its implications on Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) u...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rejects regularisation of illegal constructions, irrespective of occupancy or investments, and calls for action agai...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Service Tax : Supreme Court held that activity of lottery distributor doesn’t constitute a service and hence imposition of service tax on dist...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court clarified procedures for summons, warrants, and bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), emphasizin...
Income Tax : Supreme Court emphasizes reasonable cause for TDS non-deduction under Section 271C. Highlights interplay of Sections 4, 5, 9, and ...
Income Tax : Supreme Court reaffirms that charitable trust registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act should be based on proposed ac...
Corporate Law : Smt. Syeda Rahimunnisa and Syed Hyder Hussaini are wife and husband whereas the respondent no. 1(a) to 1(f) are the legal heirs of...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Laureate Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs Charanjeet Singh (Supreme Court of India) Larger Bench of SC declares that HUDA v. Raje Ram 2008 (17) SCC 407 and Wing Commander Arifur Rahman Khan and Anr. v. DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd. 2020 SCC Online 667 (SC) are not good law- Purchaser of flat entitled to interest on […]
This is to apprise of a recent circular bearing no. 157/13/2021-GST, dated 20th July, 2021 issued by the CBIC for ‘Clarification regarding extension of limitation under GST Law in terms of Hon’ble Supreme Court’s Order dated 27.04.2021’ as follows: Hon’ble Supreme Court has provided for extension of limitation vide an order dated 27 April 2021 […]
Substantial question of Law (SQL). On interpretation of section 260A of the Income Tax Act , 1961 and section 100 of the code of civil procedure, The Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated that it is essential that the High Court must formulate substantial question of law (SQL) and only such SQL can be and need to […]
Union of India Vs Rajendra N Shah & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) The Supreme Court on July 20 in a 2:1 majority verdict upheld the validity of the 97th constitutional amendment that deals with issues related to effective management of cooperative societies but struck down a part inserted by it which relates to the […]
Lethargy on part of the Government department in filing Appeals/SLP not acceptable after usage of IT & computerization- SC admonishes & deprecates the Public Authorities for casual approach. The Apex Court has been consistently warning Government & it’s Departments for their casual approach in delayed filing of Appeals/SLPs in the higher Courts without any reasonable […]
CA V. Venkata Sivakumar Vs. The Secretary, Institute Of Cost Accountants Of India Use of acronym ICAI by Institute of Cost Accountants of India, Hon’ble Supreme Court disposed off the case filed by CA V. Venkata Sivakumar against Institute of Cost accountants in the first hearing itself. Writ was filed by CA V. Venkata Sivakumar […]
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. (Supreme Court) SC holds that Insurance Companies are liable to pay compensation even if the vehicle is under contact and under control of State Transport Corporation and the insurance policy has been purchased by its actual owner It is common knowledge that […]
Kum. Akshatha Vs Secretary B.N.M. Education Institution and Anr. (Supreme Court of India) School Tours & School picnics are very common in schools and the students are always desirous for going in school Tours/Picnics as the students find these excursions informative, educative, and thrilling. However, there are some untoward incidents wherein the touring students suffer […]
The declaration of Court in para 53(iv) of MBA-III should prevail and the term of Chairperson of a Tribunal shall be five years or till she or he attains the age of 70 years, whichever was earlier and the term of Member of a Tribunal should be five years or till she or he attained the age of 67 years, whichever is earlier.
Franklin Templeton Trustee Services Private Limited and Another Vs Amruta Garg and Others (Supreme Court of India) Prior-consent from the unitholders if necessary even when the trustees ‘decide to wind up’ a scheme under Regulation 39(2)(a), would inevitably delay the publication of public notices as envisaged by Regulation 39(3). Therefore the cease and freeze legal […]
