Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill, 2026 clarifies who can issue notices under sections 148 and 148A. It confirms that only jurisdictional Assessing...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that once late fee is imposed for delayed annual return filing, a further general penalty is not permissible. Secti...
Income Tax : The issue was whether an assessment could be reopened after four years. The Court held that full disclosure by the taxpayer barred...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The issue was deletion of additions on unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits. The tribunal upheld deletion, holding ...
Income Tax : The issue involved dismissal of appeal due to delay and non-appearance. The tribunal condoned the delay citing medical reasons and...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment could be initiated after four years without fresh evidence. The court held such reopening inval...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment notice issued without approval from the correct authority is valid. The tribunal held it invali...
Income Tax : The Court held that reassessment proceedings must be initiated within the statutory time limit. It found the notice issued after t...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 29/2024-Central Excise rescinds six 2022 excise notifications in the public interest, effective immediately. Deta...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Kerala High Court temporarily halts recovery proceedings under Section 147 against assessee, pending tax authorities’ decision on delay condonation and stay petitions.
Delhi High Court sets aside Section 148 notice against Sanjay Bansal for AY 2016-17, citing it as time-barred. Court rejects Revenue’s extension arguments.
Ahmedabad ITAT remands Detective & Security Services’ appeal back to the Assessing Officer for reconciliation of income discrepancies, citing lack of proper verification.
Delhi High Court upholds ₹25 lakh income tax addition, citing assessee’s failure to prove genuineness and creditworthiness of an unverified loan entity.
ITAT Jaipur upholds CIT(A)’s order deleting ₹80 lakh addition under Section 68; holds share sale genuine and not accommodation entry.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed a tax demand on a police cooperative society, ruling that the reassessment proceedings were invalid.
ITAT Hyderabad held that issuance of reassessment notice u/s. 148 and 148A of the Income Tax Act after 01/04/2021 without obtaining approval from the specified authority as per amended provisions of section 151 is invalid and liable to be quashed.
ITAT Bangalore held that benefit of exemptions under section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act cannot be granted without valid registration u/s. 12A/12AA. Accordingly, exemptions u/s. 11 and 12 denied in absence of valid registration under Income Tax Act.
ITAT Surat held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act without tangible material tantamount to change of opinion on the existing facts and the same is impermissible in law. Accordingly, appeal allowed and reopening quashed.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition towards bogus Long Term Capital Gain u/s. 153A of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search. Accordingly, appeal allowed and addition deleted.
