ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed Section 147 reassessment as the Section 148 notice was issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed assessments as Section 143(2) notices were issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CBDT Instructi...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment after holding that the Section 143(2) notice was issued by an ACIT lacking jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held JDA capital gains taxable in the completion certificate year, allowed Section 54/54F relief, and deleted deeme...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Discover the significance of Surat ITAT’s ruling on digital evidence in tax cases. Learn how the case of Shanker Nebhumal Uttamchandani v. ACIT sheds light on the use of WhatsApp images in assessments.
In a recent decision, ITAT Delhi permits bad debts claimed under section 36(1)(vii) by Oriental Bank of Commerce, setting aside CIT(A)’s order.
In the case of Krishnamurthy Thiagarajan vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai), AO’s failure to record dissatisfaction u/s 14A led to ITAT allowing expenditure claim under Section 14A related to earning exempt income.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order in Prime Maxi Promotion Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT case, allowing deduction for additional compensation paid for land acquisition costs.
ITAT Mumbai grants relief to Tata Steel Limited, allowing deduction of interest paid on Perpetual Non-Convertible Debentures (PNCD) under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act.
Learn about the tax dispute between Diamond Manufacturing Management and the Indian Revenue Authority, involving fees for technical collaboration and the absence of Permanent Establishment.
Analysis of Om Prakash Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) case reveals PCIT’s jurisdiction limitations on tax issues under Land Acquisition Act Section 28.
Explore the detailed analysis of Jai Parkash Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) case where the assessment jurisdiction dispute regarding interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act was resolved.
Read about the case of Aark Infosoft Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) where the assessment was deemed void due to a delayed Section 143(2) notice.
ITAT upholds PCIT’s decision on erroneous assessment orders in tax evasion case. Changela’s appeals dismissed as inadequate inquiries led to erroneous orders.
