CA, CS, CMA : Discover IBBI Circular No. IBBI/LIQ/74/2024 dated 28-06-2024 on voluntary liquidation processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptc...
Corporate Law : Discover how Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) protects homebuyers and other consumers, with a detailed analysis of financial a...
Corporate Law : Explore the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 alongside international bankruptcy laws, focusing on key differences, similaritie...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC's ruling on Tata Steel BSL Ltd. v. Venus Recruiters allows avoidance proceedings beyond CIRP, diverging from established ...
Corporate Law : Article explains various methods for voluntary company closure in India, including striking off, NCLT winding up, and voluntary li...
Corporate Law : Learn about the new guidelines by IBBI for Insolvency Professionals acting as IRPs, Liquidators, RPs, and BTs. Details on eligibil...
Corporate Law : IBBI updates the progress report format for liquidation processes, seeking comments by July 12, 2024. Learn about the new requirem...
Corporate Law : IBBI invites comments on proposed amendments to CIRP regulations, focusing on valuation processes, MSME treatment, voting protocol...
Corporate Law : Discover how the latest revisions in CIRP forms by IBBI aim to reduce the compliance burden on insolvency professionals and stream...
Corporate Law : The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India issues guidelines for Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professio...
Corporate Law : Detailed analysis of the NCLT Mumbai judgment in SBI vs Navjeevan Tyres, addressing issues of loan recall notice and corporate gua...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi upholds NCLT decision against Rolta Private Limited's assignment agreement as malafide, prolonging CIRP process. Full ...
Company Law : Explore the Calcutta High Court's decision in Uphealth Holdings, INC. Vs Dr. Syed Sabahat Azim & Ors. regarding the applicability ...
Goods and Services Tax : Detailed analysis of Competition Commission of India's order regarding Cinema Ventures Pvt Ltd not passing GST rate reduction bene...
Custom Duty : Gujarat High Court abates customs tax appeals in Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive) Vs General Foods Ltd., citing IBC Sections 3...
Corporate Law : Detailed analysis of IBBI Order 229/2024 on Mr. Narender Kumar Sharma, resolving a show-cause notice with significant findings and...
Corporate Law : Explore the IBBI's decision on Mr. Gopal Krishna Raju regarding violations under the Companies Act, 2013 and Valuation Rules, incl...
Corporate Law : Explore IBBI's Disciplinary Order No. IBBI/DC/228/2024 dated 11 July 2024 against Reshma Mittal, detailing the CIRP process, alleg...
Corporate Law : Read the detailed analysis of IBBI's Disciplinary Committee order against Narender Kumar Sharma, an Insolvency Professional, regar...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends & Penalises RP For submitting a revised resolution plan to the Adjudicating Authority (AA) without obtaining the fin...
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India 7th Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 Circular No. IBBI/LIQ/57/2022 Dated: 21st December 2022 To All Registered Insolvency Professional All Recognised Insolvency Professional Entities All Registered Insolvency Professionals Agencies (By mail to registered email addresses and on website of the Board) Dear Madam /Sir, Subject: Proforma for reporting liquidator’s […]
NCLAT Delhi held that as per provisions of section 31 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Adjudicating Authority is empowered to either accept or reject the resolution plan. Adjudicating Authority is not empowered to modify/ alter the conditions in the resolution plan.
It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are also required to be reported under the suit-filed cases in reporting to the CICs.
𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿’𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 “𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲” 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗳 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝘂𝗲.
The Adjudicating Authority had come to the conclusion that there being pre-existing dispute application deserves rejection. The disputes pertaining to contractual issues are not to be resolved in Section 9 proceedings.
NCLAT Delhi held that appeal filed under section 7 of IBC becomes infructuous as recommendation of CoC to liquidate the company is pending for consideration before the Adjudicating Authority.
NCLAT Delhi held that Section 96(1)(b) of I&B Code cannot be read to mean that any future liability or obligation is contemplated to be stayed. Thus, stay of proceedings under Section 19(2) and Section 66-67 is not contemplated under Section 96(1)(b)
It was C.O.C which has not taken efficient measures to complete the C.I.R.P of the Corporate Debtor Company. Even in the summary findings where the order of the adjudicating authority is quoted, it is made out that it was not the case that the C.O.C had raised any dissatisfaction with regard to the conduct of the petitioner or that there had been a lapse on his part.
Understanding the voting rights of a Resolution Applicant who is also a financial creditor in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
DC observes that in view of the previous observations, it is noted that the regulation 40B(1A) of the CIRP regulation introducing the Form CIRP 7 was inserted by notification no. IBBI/2020-21/GN/REG070, dated 15.03.2021 and which came into force from the same date. Thereafter, the Form CIRP 7 was filed on 29.03.2021 and the next Form […]
