Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
Vatan Textiles Ltd.’s appeal against penalties for delayed annual return filing was rejected due to late submission. RoC Mumbai’s order confirmed.
Vatan Textiles’ appeal against penalties for delayed financial statement filing was rejected by the Regional Director, Mumbai, due to exceeding the filing deadline.
MCA penalizes Chandrabangshi Nidhi Ltd for violating Section 118(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, due to failure to maintain meeting minutes and resolutions.
United Technologies faces penalties for non-appointment of company secretary under the Companies Act, with fines for company and directors.
Registrar of Companies penalized M/s Be Bold & Confident Careers Pvt Ltd for violating Section 134 of Companies Act, 2013. Learn about the case details here.
MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 days of the order.
Shubhmangal India Nidhi Ltd. penalized for failure to mention DIN in financial statements for FY 2016-2021. Total penalty includes Rs. 22.83 lakhs under Companies Act.
Sajjan India Ltd fined ₹3.57 lakhs for failing to appoint a woman director as required by Section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013. Penalty includes company officers.
MCA issues penalty order for BCL Homes Limited under Section 117 of Companies Act, 2013. Violations attract fines up to ₹2 lakh for the company and ₹50,000 for officers.
MCA imposes penalties on BCL Homes Ltd for breaching Section 179(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed penalties include Rs. 2,00,000 on the company and fines on directors.
