Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
Under Section 178(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, MCA penalizes Best & Crompton Engineering Projects Ltd ₹39 lakh for not forming the Nomination and Remuneration Committee.
Learn about penalties imposed by MCA under Companies Act 2013 for non-compliance with CSR spending regulations. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
Explore implications of MCA’s Rs. 6 Lakh penalty under Section 89(6) for delay in filing Form MGT-6. Detailed analysis & order overview provided.
Discover the penalty imposed on Bluemax Capital Solution Pvt Ltd by MCA for failure to maintain a registered office. Learn about the violations, penalties, and compliance steps required.
MCA penalizes Bluemax Capital Solution Pvt. Ltd. ₹4.5 Lakh for failing to disclose related party transactions in AOC-2, violating Section 134(3)(h) of the Companies Act, 2013.
MCA imposes ₹6 Lakh penalty on Janaki Ram Steel and Power Pvt Ltd for failing to register charges in CHG-1 form with Registrar. Learn more about the case and implications.
Learn about the adjudication under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 for failure to file annual returns. Detailed analysis of penalties imposed on Ws. Bluemax Capital Solution Pvt Ltd and its directors.
Understand the penalty imposed by MCA on Bluemax Capital Solution Pvt Ltd for exceeding 120 days between board meetings. Details on violations and consequences.
MCA imposes a ₹20 lakh penalty on Janaki Ram Steel and Power Pvt Ltd for non-disclosure of related party transactions from FY 2015-16 to FY 2019-20.
The MCA imposes a Rs 4 lakh penalty on Trichy Fabricators Pvt Ltd for failing to disclose related party transactions in Form AOC-2. Learn more about the adjudication order.
