Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
Order against Ecospace Commodities Trade Private Limited for violating Companies Act, 2013, Section 12(1) by not maintaining a registered office.
Order against Shivnath Holdings Private Limited for violating Companies Act, 2013, Section 12(3)(c) by not printing CIN on letterhead.
Regional Director modifies ROC order, reducing penalty on Sutara Roads & Infra and its directors for CFO appointment delay.
ROC Ahmedabad penalises Divyam Infracon and its directors Rs. 4 lakh for failure to file e-Form ACTIVE as per Section 12 of Companies Act, 2013.
BIGTEC Private Limited and its directors received penalties for failing to meet their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) obligations for financial year 2023-24. Company acknowledged its non-compliance and paid fine as directed by MCA.
Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, fines Stanley OEM Sofas Ltd. and directors ₹40,000 for violating Companies Act Section 101 regarding general meeting notice periods.
Summary of the appeal by Aaryak Jewellery Pvt Ltd against penalties under Sections 42, 55, and 62 of Companies Act, 2013. Decision by MCA Regional Director.
The appeal by Maptech Poly Products Pvt Ltd against a penalty for non-maintenance of its registered office was dismissed by the Regional Director, MCA.
Tristar Transport India Pvt. Ltd. fined for delays in filing BEN-1 and BEN-2 under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Directors also face penalties.
Tristar Transport (India) Pvt. Ltd. faces penalties for delayed compliance with Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013, as per ROC Kerala’s adjudication order.
