Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
Emperium Constructions Pvt Ltd fined Rs. 50,000 for delayed INC-20A filing. Directors penalized Rs. 19,000 each under Section 10A of Companies Act, 2013.
APS Micro Credit fined Rs. 1 lakh for violating Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013. Director failed to mention DIN in financial statements for FY 2013-15.
The ROC, Punjab & Chandigarh, imposed penalties on Arisebhavishya India Mutual Benefit Nidhi Ltd for failing to maintain a registered office per Companies Act, 2013.
Arles Maxent Associates LLP and its designated partners fined ₹1.5 lakh by Chennai ROC for violating Section 13 of the LLP Act, 2008, due to failure to maintain a registered office.
Regional Director modifies CSR penalty for Clairvoyant India, waiving fines for directors, and reducing company penalty due to procedural errors.
River Mobility Pvt. Ltd. appealed against a ₹3L penalty for delayed share certificate issuance. ITAT reduced it to ₹1L. Read the full case summary.
Infracx Developers Pvt Ltd penalized for delayed INC-20A filing under Section 10A of the Companies Act, 2013. Total penalty: ₹43,000.
Vishnupriya Hotels’ appeal led to a penalty reduction for non-compliance with Section 149(3) of the Companies Act. The company paid Rs. 60,000 after adjudication.
Konoria Plaschem faced penalties for failing to appoint an internal auditor from 2014-2020. The fine was reduced on appeal. Read the case details.
Water & Sanitation (India) for Urban Poor failed to hold board meetings from 2011-2019, leading to penalties. The fine was later reduced on appeal.
