Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : Tristar Transport (India) Pvt. Ltd. faces penalties for delayed compliance with Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013, as per ROC ...
Company Law : Regional Director modifies CSR penalty for Clairvoyant India, waiving fines for directors, and reducing company penalty due to pro...
Company Law : Vatan Textiles Ltd.'s appeal against penalties for delayed annual return filing was rejected due to late submission. RoC Mumbai's ...
Company Law : Vatan Textiles' appeal against penalties for delayed financial statement filing was rejected by the Regional Director, Mumbai, due...
Company Law : Emperium Constructions Pvt Ltd fined Rs. 50,000 for delayed INC-20A filing. Directors penalized Rs. 19,000 each under Section 10A ...
The breach relates to the absence of signatures from any directors on the company’s Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021. Following a hearing, penalties were levied: the company was fined Rs. 3,00,000, while each director, Mr. Veerendra Kumar Vishwakarma and Ms. Neelam Gautam, faced fines of Rs. 50,000 each.
Explore implications of violating Section 12(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Delve into an order under section 454 and penalties imposed for non-compliance.
Learn about the penalty imposed on LOIN TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED under Section 134(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, by the Registrar of Companies, Madhya Pradesh.
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan fines M/s EMBASSY INFRATECH INDIA LIMITED and its directors a total of 9 lakh rupees for failing to conduct minimum required four board meetings annually, violating Section 173 of Companies Act, 2013
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan fines M/s EMBASSY INFRATECH INDIA LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 119 of Companies Act, 2013 by not maintaining meeting records due to non-existence of registered office
Violation of Section 135(5) occurs when a company fails to comply with this requirement by not spending the prescribed amount on CSR activities within the stipulated time frame.
This document is a notice issued by the Registrar of Companies, Gujarat, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India. The notice pertains to the adjudication of a penalty against Starnet Real Estate Development Limited (formerly known as Starnet Software (India) Limited) for violation of Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013. […]
The order states that the members of the company had passed a special resolution to alter the main objects clause of the Memorandum of Association at an Extraordinary General Meeting held on January 30, 2021. As per Section 117 of the Companies Act, 2013, the resolution was required to be filed within 30 days. However, the company filed the required form, MGT-14, with a delay of 261 days.
Learn about the penalty imposed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on FERANBRAJ TOLL AND HIGHWAY PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Section 15 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Discover the case of M/S FERANBRAJ TOLL AND HIGHWAY PRIVATE LIMITED penalized for non-compliance with Companies Act Section 118(10). Analysis of the penalty imposition and its implications.
