Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
VERMES MICRODISPENSING INDIA Private Limited and its directors were fined by the ROC for a delay of 359 days in filing a declaration of a significant beneficial owner.
The ROC Ahmedabad has imposed a penalty on GUJARAT PEANUT AND AGRI PRODUCTS LTD. and its directors for operating outside its Memorandum of Association for over five years.
ROC Bangalore issued an adjudication order against PACE DIGITEK LIMITED and two officers for failing to appoint a company secretary as mandated by the Companies Act.
A company and its directors face penalties from the ROC for failing to appoint a whole-time company secretary, in violation of the Companies Act, 2013.
A company and its directors received penalties from the ROC for failing to attach the annual return to the Board’s Report, violating the Companies Act.
ROC Ahmedabad imposes penalties on Kheria Autocomp Ltd. and directors for failing to maintain minimum member count under Companies Act, 2013.
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Ahmedabad has issued a penalty against SPUNWEB NONWOVEN LTD. and its directors for failing to maintain the mandatory 120-day gap between board meetings. The company admitted to the violation, resulting in a penalty of ₹25,000 for each director.
The Registrar of Companies has imposed penalties on SHASHWATHA NIDHI LIMITED for a significant delay in filing a board resolution related to its financial statements, a violation of the Companies Act, 2013.
Director fined by ROC Telangana for violating Section 155 of Companies Act, 2013, possessing two DINs. Penalty imposed for 672-day default.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ Regional Director modified penalties against Virupaksha Organics Limited and its directors for non-appointment of KMPs, excluding non-executive directors.
