Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
MCA penalizes SBO for a 1636-day delay in filing BEN-2 and Astrum Stamping Pvt. Ltd. and its director for violating Sections 90(4A) and 90(7) of Companies Act.
Faurecia India fined for failing to include Secretarial Audit Report in Board Report under Section 204 of Companies Act, 2013, by Maharashtra ROC.
The Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, Pune, issued an adjudication order penalizing Vitthal Corporation Limited under Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Adjudication order issued for Jain Recycling Pvt Ltd for non-compliance with Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Details of violations and penalties outlined.
Cryo Scientific Systems fined for not filing e-form CHG-4 to report satisfaction of charge under Section 82 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Cryo Scientific Systems Private Limited fined for non-disclosure of related party transactions and remuneration, violating Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Unique Bharati Publication Pvt Ltd penalized for failing to file MGT-14 under Companies Act, 2013. Penalties imposed on the company and its directors.
Unique Bharati Publication faces penalties totaling ₹4 lakh for failing to include Directors’ Identification Numbers in financial statements for FY 2014-16.
Pioneer Adhesives Pvt. Ltd. faces penalties for failing to file significant beneficial owner details under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The Registrar of Companies imposes penalties on SML Isuzu and its officers for violating Section 196 of the Companies Act, 2013, concerning the reappointment of a director.
