Income Tax : CBDT has notified Cost Inflation Index (CII) from 1981-82 to 2023-24. Find out the Meaning & Index of CII and its use for computin...
Income Tax : A person becomes senior citizen under Income Tax Act in any year after attaining the age of 60 even for one day. Once he attains 6...
Income Tax : Explore the intricacies of capital gains on Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) and the exemption under Section 54 of the Income T...
Income Tax : Provisions of section 28 of Income Tax Act, 1961 specify income chargeable to income tax under ‘Profits and gains of business or...
Income Tax : Curbing cash transactions Section 269SS of Income Tax Act mandates electronic modes for loans above ₹20,000 to fight black money...
Goods and Services Tax : TaxGuru, GST Professionals and Govt. of India (Ministry of M.S.M.E) announces its Online GST Course Covering whole Gamut of GST an...
CA, CS, CMA : We at Taxguru Wishes all our Readers, Staff, Panel Authors, Freelancers, Technical Support Team, Sales team, Editorial Team and Th...
CA, CS, CMA : In a series of attacks on Chartered Accountants latest is been alleged by A CA from Pune that he has been slapped by a Service Tax...
Income Tax : CA Sandeep Kanoi After protest from all over India partial extension by CBDT, Dr. Hasmukh Adhia who took over as Revenue Secretary...
Income Tax : In this article we have compiled the details of release of Schema of ITR Forms for AY 2015-16 , Schema of Forms (Other than ITR), ...
Income Tax : Hon'ble SC held that Making a claim which would prima facie disclose that the expenses in respect of which deduction has been clai...
Income Tax : It is not in dispute that the period during which interim stay of the order passed by the court is in operation has to be excluded...
Income Tax : The initial assessment year has been defined and the expression or' has been used in respect of new units by stating commences op...
Income Tax : Where no question was asked during statement recorded under section 132(4), in respect of manner of earning income surrendered, as...
Income Tax : We understand that in case of search, assessee is to comply with law and various declaration and formalities which certainly take ...
Income Tax : The Karnataka State Chartered Accountants Association ('KSCAA') has Fled a representation dated 15.09.2015 in Central board of Dir...
Income Tax : Vide its order dated 30.09.2015 CBDT has extended due date only for the state of Haryana, Punjab , Union Territory of Chandigarh a...
Income Tax : It has been brought to the notice of the Government that a fake order dated 26th September 2015 supposedly under section 119 of th...
Income Tax : Notification No. 32/2014-Income Tax Form of return of net wealth. — (1) The return of net wealth referred to in section 14 shall...
Recently Delhi High Court has in the case of Acorus Unitech Wireless Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT held that The law only requires that the information or material on which the AO records his or her satisfaction is communicated to the asseseee, without mandating the disclosure of any specific document.
Recently Delhi High Court has in the case of Sony India Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT held that It is expected of from Assessing Officer, having rejected the stay application, to wait for a reasonable period before he takes coercive steps to recover the amounts
In the present case, it is not in doubt that the payment of tax made by resident/ depositor is in excess and the department chooses to refund the excess payment of tax to the depositor. We have held the interest requires to be paid on such refunds. The catechize is from what date interest is payable, since the present case does not fall either under clause (a) or (b) of Section 244A of the Act.
In the case of CIT vs. Dawoodi Bohara Jamat SC has held that the respondent-trust is a charitable and religious trust which does not benefit any specific religious community and therefore, it cannot be held that Section 13(1)(b) of the Act would be attracted to the respondent-trust and thereby, it would be eligible to claim exemption under Section 11 of the Act.
For grant of deduction u/s 54F in case of construction of a residential house, the condition is that the assessee has within a period of three years after the date of transfer of long term asset, constructed a residential house.
Hon’ble Bombay HC has recently held in the case of Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Ltd. Vs. CIT that In the event, the Counsel engaged by the Department is absent without a justifiable or reasonable cause, we will invariably impose costs and to be paid by the Counsel personally.
A bare reading of section 54F clearly shows that the assessee is entitled for exemption in case he / she constructs a residential house within a period of three years after the sale of the capital asset. However, sub clause (4) of section 54F clearly says that the unutilized portion of the net sale consideration which is otherwise liable for capital gain tax shall be deposited in the capital gain account scheme within the period of due date for filing return of income u/s 139.
Recently In the case of CIT Vs. Sahara India (Firm) Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has held that amount received from deposits from the public under different finance schemes cannot be treated as Income of the Assessee as Assessee is a mere custodian of the deposit.
The applicant had collected Rs.2.59 Cores of Service Tax during the period 2010-2011 to 2013-2014 but had not deposited the said amount except Rs.15 Lakhs. The applicant had in fact never filed any service tax returns and as such knowingly utilized the Government monies for his personal use.
AAR held that various factors have to be taken into account to decide a Fixed place PE which inter alia includes a right of disposal over the premises. No strait jacket formula applicable to all cases can be laid down.
