This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No RCM Demand Where Service Provider Paid Tax Under Forward Charge: CESTAT Hyderabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Arunachala Logistics Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Arunachala Logistics Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)
No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge: CESTAT Hyderabad
The CESTAT, Hyderabad in the case of M/s Arunachala Logistics (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad [Service Tax Appeal No. 30548 of 2018, Final Order No. A/30129/2026, order dated February 27, 2026]held that where the entire service tax liability has already been discharged by the service provider, any further demand on the service recipient under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (R...
Author Info
