Inar Profiles Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
CESTAT held that exemption under Notification No.12/2012-CE is available to sub-contractor who supplied the goods to the main contractor who has been awarded contract/ work order under ICB....
Read More
IND Synergy Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
IND Synergy Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad) This appeal has been filed by M/s IND Synergy Ltd., (Raipur) assailing the order-in-original dated 31.07.2020 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs Visakhapatnam, the operative part of which is as follows: (a) “I deny the benefit of Notification No. 097/2004-Cus...
Read More
KPR Fertilizers Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
CESTAT Hyderabad held that classifying micronutrients manufactured by the appellant, as plant growth regulators, under Chapter heading 38089304 instead of Chapter heading 3105 is unsustainable...
Read More
OSI Systems Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
OSI Systems Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) The brief facts are that the appellant was an assessee under the service tax regime and they migrated to GST regime and they also filed TRAN-1 for taking forward the credit which was lying in their Cenvat credit register. Subsequently, it was pointed out […]...
Read More
Satyam Computer Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
CESTAT Hyderabad held that CENVAT Credit of service tax paid on premium for medical insurance of employees and their families is eligible....
Read More
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Macro Media Digital Imaging Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
There would be difference if a person was engaged in proving any service connected with the making or preparation of the advertisement and a case where a person merely complied with the instruction of the clients for printing the contents supplied by the client thus, the activity of printing of advertisement content on PVC materials amoun...
Read More
Bagadiya Brothers Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
CESTAT Hyderabad held that confiscation of already exported goods not possible under section 113 of the Customs Act because once the goods are exported, Indian Customs has no control over the goods and therefore, they cannot be confiscated....
Read More
Commissioner of Central Tax Vs Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
ITAT Hyderabad held that Cenvat credit of inputs used in manufacture of goods exported under bond from a Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit is available as refund under rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004....
Read More
Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
CESTAT Hyderabad held that extended period of limitation can be invoked only when there is willful suppression of facts with an intention to evade payment of service tax....
Read More
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Hyderabad) -
1981 Circular of the Board clarifies that losses of up to 1% can be allowed without detailed scrutiny and loss above 1% can be condoned after scrutiny, we find no reason to not condone losses in these cases as claimed....
Read More