CESTAT Hyderabad

CESTAT quashes Duty Demand: No Proof of Price Influence in Party Relationship

Krishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

CESTAT Hyderabad quashes differential duty demand against KRIBHCO, citing lack of evidence for price influence in OMIFCO relationship. Full text of the order....

Rejecting Transaction Value Based on Assumption Contrary to Customs Act Section 14 & Valuation Rules 8

Krishna Traders Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

Krishna Traders Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad): Transaction value cannot be rejected on mere assumption/presumption and against provisions of Section 14 of Customs Act read with Rule 8 of Valuation rules...

CESTAT Set Asides Confiscation of Gold Biscuits for Lack of Illegal Smuggling evidence

Mitta Sunil Kumar Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad)

Explore the CESTAT Hyderabad decision directing the release of gold bars seized as smuggled goods in Mitta Sunil Kumar vs Commissioner of Customs case. Learn about the legal arguments and outcome....

 RCM applicable only when service is provided to ‘business entity registered as body corporate’

Managing Director, APMSIDC Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

Find out why RCM applicable only when service is provided to ‘business entity registered as body corporate’ is key to understanding the full CESTAT Hyderabad order from 2016-2017. Learn the facts now!...

No Service Tax on Water and Electricity Supply to Tenants by GMR: CESTAT

GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

CESTAT Hyderabad rules that no service tax is payable on electricity and water supplied to tenants by GMR Hyderabad Airport, citing government exemptions....

Tax Claims Extinguish Upon NCLT Approval of Resolution Plan: CESTAT

Icomm Tele Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

CESTAT Hyderabad rules that government tax claims are extinguished upon NCLT's approval of a resolution plan, settling all disputes....

CENVAT Credit Reversal for Polyester Spun Yarn Manufacturer under Rule 6(3)(i)

Suryauday Spinning Mills Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Secunderabad - GST (CESTAT Hyderabad)

CESTAT Hyderabad's ruling on CENVAT credit reversal for a polyester spun yarn manufacturer and the use of Rule 6(3) in central excise regulations....

CESTAT Reduces Penalty for Negligence in Import Declaration Due to Lack of Malicious Intent

Caravel Logistics Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad)

CESTAT Hyderabad lowers penalty for discrepancies in import declaration due to negligence, in absence of ulterior motive. Detailed analysis of the case....

CESTAT Grants Relief to Insurer, Allowing Closure U/s. 73(3) of Finance Act

Shriram Life Insurance Co. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)

Read about the CESTAT Hyderabad decision in Shriram Life Insurance vs. Commissioner of Customs case. CESTAT quashes service tax demand, citing Section 73(3) of the Finance Act....

CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax Demand in Facebook Payment Case

P. Ramesh Kumar Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Secunderabad-GST (CESTAT Hyderabad)

CESTAT Hyderabad orders the refund of service tax demand on P. Ramesh Kumar for foreign exchange payments to Facebook, citing lack of evidence for business purposes. Full order details....

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (6,867)
Company Law (10,059)
Corporate Law (13,522)
Custom Duty (10,814)
DGFT (5,155)
Excise Duty (5,616)
Fema / RBI (5,765)
Finance (6,484)
Income Tax (49,800)
SEBI (5,333)
Service Tax (4,889)

Search Posts by Date

February 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829