This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SAFEMA Tribunal: FERA Penalty Unsustainable Without Evidence in Hawala Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Satya @ Subendy Majumdar Vs Special Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- SAFEMA
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Satya @ Subendy Majumdar Vs Special Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
SAFEMA Tribunal: FERA Penalty Cannot Be Sustained Without Evidence Of Role In Hawala Transaction
The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA allowed the appeal filed by Satya @ Subendy Majumdar and set aside the penalty imposed under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973.
The case arose from investigations into a hawala network linked to cross-border transactions between India, Bangladesh, and Singapore, where funds generated through alleged over-invoicing of tea exports were transferred ab...





