Case Law Details
Case Name : Satya @ Subendy Majumdar Vs Special Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
SAFEMA
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satya @ Subendy Majumdar Vs Special Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
SAFEMA Tribunal: FERA Penalty Cannot Be Sustained Without Evidence Of Role In Hawala Transaction
The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA allowed the appeal filed by Satya @ Subendy Majumdar and set aside the penalty imposed under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973.
The case arose from investigations into a hawala network linked to cross-border transactions between India, Bangladesh, and Singapore, where funds generated through alleged over-invoicing of tea exports were transferred abroad through info...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

