Case Law Details
Case Name : Abdul Razzak A Rajkotia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2000- 2001
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abdul Razzak A Rajkotia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)- There is no material worth the name found at the time of search divulging the undisclosed income earned by the assessee by way of unrecorded sales. Seized material relates to unrecorded sale by the `Compay’ and that too for a period of 18 days from 0 1.04.2003 to 18.04.2003. Neither there is any mention of such seized material containing the unrecorded sales of the assessee’s proprietorship concern, nor it is the case of the Assessing Officer that there was anything else to show that the assessee was also indulging in recording sales partly o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

