Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urmish M. Udani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urmish M. Udani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) No valid notice u/s 143(2); one notice was premature (before return) & the other was time-barred- Entire 147/143(3) assessment held void ab initio – ITAT Mumbai quashes reassessment A survey u/s 133A was conducted in the case of U.S. Roofs Ltd. & U.S. Realty Ltd. (group concerns of the assessee, who was the Managing Director). AO issued a notice u/s 148 on 24.11.2010, & simultaneously issued notice u/s 142(1) & 143(2) on 02.02.2011. However, Assessee filed his return of income only on 03.03.2011. Tribunal noted a crucial jurisdictiona...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930