Case Law Details
Case Name : Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Once overall source is accepted, Section 69A cannot be invoked merely due to lack of one-to-one correlation- ITAT Mumbai deletes adhoc addition on cash deposits
Assessee, an individual lady, did not file her return of income originally for AY 2017-18. On receiving AIR information that she had earned interest income, made cash deposits of ₹42.50 lakh in HDFC Bank, purchased time deposits & mutual funds of ₹30 lakh, AO reopened the case u/s 148. In response, Assessee filed a return declaring ₹9,22,640 inc
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


