Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vijay Prakash Ghosalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Once overall source is accepted, Section 69A cannot be invoked merely due to lack of one-to-one correlation- ITAT Mumbai deletes adhoc addition on cash deposits

Assessee, an individual lady, did not file her return of income originally for AY 2017-18. On receiving AIR information that she had earned interest income, made cash deposits of ₹42.50 lakh in HDFC Bank, purchased time deposits & mutual funds of ₹30 lakh, AO reopened the case u/s 148. In response, Assessee filed a return declaring ₹9,22,640 inc

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728