Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : OTM Jewellery (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
OTM Jewellery (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The basic evidence to prove the contention of assessee was contract between assessee and the organisers, which assessee failed to produce before A.O. The Ld. CIT(A) rejected the request for admission of the additional evidences. Whatever contention have been raised by the assessee, have not been substantiated through any evidence or material on record. It, therefore, stand proved that assessee paid the amount in question to the Jewellery Market Exhibition for giving stall for exhibition. Thus, space is allotted to the assessee for carrying-out its bus...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. Ramesh Chand Gupta says:

    I HAVE PAID EXHIBITIN RENT PAID 61000.00 dt. Nov- 2021 & 2nd time paid same company Rs. 84500.00 dt. 06.01.2022 . If Tds Applicable ( our Firm Status is Partnership)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930