Case Law Details
Case Name : OTM Jewellery (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
OTM Jewellery (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
The basic evidence to prove the contention of assessee was contract between assessee and the organisers, which assessee failed to produce before A.O. The Ld. CIT(A) rejected the request for admission of the additional evidences. Whatever contention have been raised by the assessee, have not been substantiated through any evidence or material on record. It, therefore, stand proved that assessee paid the amount in question to the Jewellery Market Exhibition for giving stall fo Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
I HAVE PAID EXHIBITIN RENT PAID 61000.00 dt. Nov- 2021 & 2nd time paid same company Rs. 84500.00 dt. 06.01.2022 . If Tds Applicable ( our Firm Status is Partnership)