Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Siemens Public Communication Network P. Ltd. vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA Saurabh Chokhra Brief of the case: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the above cited case held that amount received as subvention/grant from parent company by a loss making subsidiary cannot be considered as revenue receipt in the hands of subsidiary company as grant was made by parent company to protect its investment made in subsidiary. Therefore, such grant is a capital receipt which is not taxable.  Facts of the case: The assessee company received subvention (grant) from its parent company (Germany based) to support assessee company whose business situation gone worse.AO added the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. SathikondaA says:

    Facts of the case:
    In the second paragraph of Facts of the case –
    “CIT (A) and ITAT reversed the finding of tribunal”
    in the above part of the sentence the word “tribunal” is to be replaced with the word “Assessing Officer”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930