Since their launch in 2015, Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs) have been the undisputed champion of gold investments in India. They offered a trifecta that physical gold or ETFs couldn’t match: a sovereign guarantee, 2.5% annual interest, and—crucially—tax-free returns on maturity.
However, the Union Budget 2026 has introduced a structural amendment via the Finance Bill, 2026, that fundamentally alters this landscape. By tightening Section 70(1)(x) of the Income-tax Act, the government is replacing the old “blanket exemption” with a stricter “conditional exemption.”
Here is how this amendment changes the rules of the game.
1. The Old Rule: Why the Loophole Existed
To understand the impact, we have to look at how things worked pre-2026. Under the original scheme, if an individual held an SGB until its 8-year maturity, the capital gains were 100% tax-free.
The catch was in the interpretation: this benefit applied to anyone holding the bond at maturity. It didn’t matter if you were the original subscriber or if you bought the bond on the stock exchange (secondary market) just a month before redemption. This created a massive arbitrage opportunity where investors bought SGBs on the secondary market specifically to pocket tax-free gains.
2. The New Rule: The “Twin Test”
The Finance Act, 2026, aims to close this gap. Effective from April 1, 2026, the tax exemption on maturity is no longer automatic. To qualify for tax-free redemption, an investor must now pass a “Twin Test”:
1. Original Subscription: You must be the investor who subscribed to the bond during the primary issue by the RBI.
2. Continuous Holding: You must have held that specific bond continuously from the date of issue until maturity.
Now, if you don’t meet both criteria, the tax shield is gone.
The amendment has been tabulated below:
| Pre-amendment Section 70(1)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 2025 (erstwhile Section 47(viic) of the Income Tax Act, 1961) | Proposed amendment in Section 70(1)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 2025 by way of Finance Bill, 2026 |
| Transactions not regarded as transfer…
(viic) any transfer of Sovereign Gold Bond issued by the Reserve Bank of India under the Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme, 2015, by way of redemption, by an assessee being an individual; |
“(x) by way of redemption, of Sovereign Gold Bond issued by the Reserve Bank of India under the Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme, 2015 or any subsequent Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme, if held by an individual from the date of original issue till maturity;” |
3. Impact on Investors: Two Different Worlds
The most significant outcome of this amendment is that SGB investors are now split into two distinct classes.
A. The Original Subscriber (Status Quo Maintained)
For the conservative investor who applies during the RBI subscription window and holds for 8 years nothing changes.
-
- Capital Gains: Redemption proceeds are still fully tax-exempt.
- Interest: The 2.5% interest is still taxed according to your income slab.
B. The Secondary Market Investor (Taxed)
This is where the situation changes. If you buy SGBs on the exchange (NSE/BSE), you fail the “Twin Test.”
-
- Taxability: Redemption is now treated as a standard “Transfer.”
- The Cost: You will pay Capital Gains tax. Since SGBs are listed securities, holding them for over 12 months classifies the profit as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and under current rates it is likely to be taxed at 12.5% (without indexation benefits).
Note: There is a narrow transition window. If you can redeem an SGB before March 31, 2026, the old law applies. However, since redemption dates are fixed by the RBI, investors cannot force an early exit unless the official schedule aligns with this window.
4. Market Ripple Effects
This tax change will likely force a repricing in the gold market.
- Price Correction: Previously, SGBs on the exchange often traded at a premium because buyers priced in the tax benefit. Now, secondary buyers will likely demand a discount to offset their future 12.5% tax liability.
- The Rise of ETFs: The SGB’s “superpower” was its tax exemption. Without it, secondary market SGBs lose their edge over Gold ETFs. ETFs offer far superior liquidity without the 8-year lock-in. If a secondary buyer has to pay tax on SGBs anyway, the flexibility of an ETF becomes much more attractive.
Conclusion
The Finance Bill 2026 sends a clear signal: Tax incentives are for long-term, primary participants, not for traders exploiting market inefficiencies. While the SGB remains the gold standard for those entering at the issue stage, the secondary market has effectively been demoted from a “tax haven” to a standard debt market.
*****
Author: Devesh Aggarwal, Direct Tax Litigation (ITAT), VED JAIN & ASSOCIATES, New Delhi – 110001
Author Bio
Consider this situation. The original holder expires after 1 April 2026. On producing the death certificate to the depository, all assets are transferred to the nominee’s demat.
What would be the tax implication now ?
Will the redemption be allowed after 8 years completion or will it be a forced redemption.
Either ways, should the nominee/heir be taxed as he is not the original holder or will he be considered as “standing in the shoes” of the original subscriber and hence the rules of original subscriber applies.
The decision to withdraw the holdings if forced by the RBI, then will the nominee/heir be considered as making an early redemption ?