Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kishore Kumar Gurnani Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kishore Kumar Gurnani Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) Both assessees had sold equity shares of M/s Vankon Moduler Pvt. Ltd. &  declared capital gains after computing fair market value @ ₹32 per share. Their assessments were completed u/s 143(3) after compulsory scrutiny, where AO issued notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) &  specifically recorded that he had examined all details &  verified the facts, &  accordingly accepted the returned income. PCIT invoked revision u/s 263, holding that AO passed the orders in a “routine &  casual manner” without verifying the FMV of shares....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930