Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kishore Kumar Gurnani Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kishore Kumar Gurnani Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Both assessees had sold equity shares of M/s Vankon Moduler Pvt. Ltd. &  declared capital gains after computing fair market value @ ₹32 per share. Their assessments were completed u/s 143(3) after compulsory scrutiny, where AO issued notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) &  specifically recorded that he had examined all details &  verified the facts, &  accordingly accepted the returned income.

PCIT invoked revision u/s 263, holding that AO passed the orders in a “routine &  casual manner” without verifying

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Under Section 147/144 Struck Down for Not Issuing Section 143(2) Despite Valid Return Survey-Based 8% Estimation Cut to 4%: ITAT Ensures Parity With Parents’ Cases Temple Vazhipadu vs Demonetisation: ITAT Deletes SBN Addition of Rs. 1.45 Lakh Vivad se Vishwas Opt-Out Does Not Bar Tax Appeal: ITAT Decision Section 96 Overrides Income Tax for Post-2014 Land Acquisitions View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031