Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rashida Yahya Bangalorewala Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rashida Yahya Bangalorewala Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Cash Deposits from Son’s Mobile Trading Business – 69A Addition Deleted; Only 8% Presumptive Income Taxable u/s 44AD Assessee, an individual, did not file return originally. Based on RMS data, AO found cash deposits of ₹76,81,000/- in her SBI bank account. Proceedings u/s 148A(b) were initiated & reassessment notice u/s 148 was issued on 15.03.2024. In response, Assessee filed return offering income @ 5% u/s 44AD on turnover of ₹82,50,200/- amounting to ₹4,95,012. She explained that during Covid-19 financial crisis, her son was ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031