Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Budhia Auto (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Budhia Auto (ITAT Raipur) AO completed original scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) in Feb 2015, accepting unpaid VAT & Service Tax as balance sheet items. Later, AO reopened assessment u/s 147 (notice issued in Mar 2019, beyond 4 years) alleging non-payment of Service tax ₹7.63 lakh (paid in Mar 2013, after ITR due date)& VAT ₹3.92 crore (unpaid at return filing date). AO added ₹4.00 crore u/s 43B, completing reassessment ex parte. CIT(A) Findings During original assessment, AO had specifically asked about unpaid statutory liabilities. Assessee had clarified that VAT & Se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930