Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Javaji Naga Darshan Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Javaji Naga Darshan Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The Bangalore ITAT allowed the assessee’s claim for deduction under Section 54/54F, holding that substantive investment in construction of a residential house cannot be denied merely due to incomplete documentation. The AO and CIT(A) had disallowed the claim of ₹33.18 lakh on the ground that the assessee failed to furnish complete documents such as approved plans, possession certificate, and full construction bills. However, the Tribunal observed that: The assessee had produced a Joint Development Agreement (JDA), Sample construction bills, and ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031