This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 41(1) addition cannot be made merely for non-confirmation by creditors
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Krishnaping Alloys Ltd vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Krishnaping Alloys Ltd vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Ld. AO had alleged that the so called trading liability existed in the books of accounts of the assessee is non-genuine, because none of the creditors have confirmed the liability, when enquiries was conducted by issue of notice u/s 133(6) of the I.T.Act, 1961. The Ld. AO had also taken support from the fact that the so called shareholders have gifted their shares to the directors and relatives in subsequent financial years. No doubt, there may be no response from certain creditors in response to 133(6) notices, but non appearance o...






