Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Jhunjhunwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandip Jhunjhunwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata Deletes Penalty u/s 271AAA—No Penalty Where Search Disclosure Is Properly Explained and Tax Paid The Kolkata Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Sandip Jhunjhunwala for AY 2012-13 and deleted the penalty of ₹1.44 crore levied under section 271AAA. The Tribunal held that no penalty is leviable where the assessee satisfies all three conditions prescribed under section 271AAA(2). In the present case, during the course of search under section 132, the assessee had admitted undisclosed income of ₹14.40 crore in his statement under se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031