Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Gopaldas Bajaj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjay Gopaldas Bajaj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 54 Deduction Allowed in Reassessment Despite No Original Return: ITAT Mumbai Applies Correct Reading of Sun Engineering The Mumbai ITAT (“F” Bench) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2015-16 and held that deduction under section 54 cannot be denied merely because no original return was filed under section 139(1), where the claim is made in a return filed in response to notice under section 148 and is directly relatable to the escaped income. In this case, reassessment was initiated on account of long-term capital gains arisin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked as AO Made No Addition After Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930