Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Gopaldas Bajaj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjay Gopaldas Bajaj Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Section 54 Deduction Allowed in Reassessment Despite No Original Return: ITAT Mumbai Applies Correct Reading of Sun Engineering The Mumbai ITAT (“F” Bench) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2015-16 and held that deduction under section 54 cannot be denied merely because no original return was filed under section 139(1), where the claim is made in a return filed in response to notice under section 148 and is directly relatable to the escaped income. In this case, reassessment was initiated on account of long-term capital gains arisin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Complianc U/s 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031